WORKED EXAMPLE 1 OF 8 · RANKING

A request to falsify an assessment

A teaching example written for this guide, not an official MSRA question or answer key.

The question

You are an F2 doctor.3 A colleague asks you4 to sign a form saying you observed them complete a workplace assessment yesterday. You did not observe it, and they confirm it did not take place5. Their deadline is tomorrow.6 There is no immediate patient-care problem.7

Rank these independent actions1 from 1, most appropriate, to 4, least appropriate2.

  • A: Explain that you cannot certify8 an assessment that did not happen, and offer to help them arrange a genuine assessment9 with an appropriate assessor before the deadline.
  • B: Decline to sign and explain that the statement would be false.10
  • C: Tell them you are too busy to look at it now and will think about it later11.
  • D: Observe them perform the procedure now and sign the form with yesterday’s date12 so they meet the deadline.

Try it first. Write down your order from 1 to 4, plus one sentence explaining why your first choice beats your second. Then work through the steps and compare your reasoning, not just your answer.

Step 1 · Read the instruction

WHAT TO DO

Check what kind of answer you need before you read the scenario closely. Ranking and choose-three questions ask for different kinds of thinking.

  • InstructionRank these independent actions
    This is a ranking question. Judge each action as if it were the only thing you did. Don’t think “I’d do B first, then A”: NHS England says ranking options are not chronological.
  • Instruction1, most appropriate, to 4, least appropriate
    Check the direction of the scale: here 1 is best. Each rank is used once, so you’ll need a reason for the order of the weaker options too. Marks depend on how close your whole order is to the key, not just whether your top answer is right.

Step 2 · Work out your role and who is affected

WHAT TO DO

Ask what you’re responsible for, what you can safely do and who your choice affects. This tells you whose problem each option is solving.

  • ScenarioYou are an F2 doctor.
    A signature on an assessment form is your professional statement that you saw something happen. Responsibility for what the form says is yours, not your colleague’s.
  • ScenarioA colleague asks you
    Your colleague is under pressure and wants help. A strong answer can protect the record and still be kind to them.

Less visibly, the training programme and future patients are affected too. They rely on an assessment meaning that a doctor was actually observed.

Step 3 · Separate facts from assumptions, and find the risk

WHAT TO DO

List what the question tells you. Then notice what you might be tempted to assume. Base your answer only on stated facts.

Don’t assume that your colleague is habitually dishonest, that they will face disciplinary action, or that a supervisor must be told. None of these is stated, so none should affect your ranking.

Step 4 · Name the tension and write your task

WHAT TO DO

Most PD questions set two reasonable duties against each other. Name them, then write the task in one sentence. You’ll then know what a strong answer looks like before you read the options.

Here you need to help a colleague under pressure while keeping a professional record honest. Honesty can’t be traded away: you can’t sign for something you didn’t see. So the real question is how helpful you can be while refusing.

Your task: I need to refuse clearly to make a false record, and help my colleague meet the deadline legitimately if I can.

A strong answer will therefore contain a clear refusal and, ideally, a legitimate way forward.

Step 5 · Read each option literally

WHAT TO DO

Break each option into verb + recipient + timing + condition. Judge only what is written, without adding steps the option doesn’t include.

Step 6 · Sort into good, acceptable and poor

WHAT TO DO

Don’t try to rank four options at once. Find the clearest best and worst, then sort everything into rough groups. Ranking then becomes a few small comparisons.

GroupOptionsWhat they have in common
GoodA, BBoth refuse the false record honestly.
PoorC, DC leaves the dishonest request open. D carries it out.

You now have two smaller decisions: A versus B at the top, and C versus D at the bottom.

Step 7 · Compare neighbours and settle the order

WHAT TO DO

For each pair of neighbours, complete this sentence: “X ranks above Y because [fact from the scenario] makes [specific difference] matter here.” If you can’t name the fact, you’re probably relying on a general impression.

A versus B. A ranks above B because the deadline is tomorrow, which makes A’s offer to arrange a genuine assessment a useful difference. It solves your colleague’s real problem honestly. A wins because of what its extra words do, not because it is longer.

B versus C. B ranks above C because your colleague has asked you to sign a false statement, and B answers that request clearly. C avoids it and leaves the door open.

C versus D. Both are poor, so compare the harm. C does nothing yet. D produces a falsified record. Carrying out the dishonest act is worse than delaying a refusal.

Suggested answer

A → B → C → D

RankActionReason
1ARefuses honestly and offers a legitimate way to meet the deadline.
2BRefuses honestly but offers no practical help.
3CAvoids signing for now, but leaves the dishonest request open and implies you may agree.
4DSounds like a compromise because an assessment does happen, but the date makes the record false.

What could change the answer

WHAT TO DO

Finish every question by asking: “What fact would make my preferred action inappropriate?” If that fact is absent, keep it out of your reasoning.

  • If D said “observe them now and record today’s date”, it would be honest and could rank highly. One word, “yesterday’s”, puts it last. Read dates, names and conditions precisely.
  • If your colleague kept pressing you, or you learned they had falsified other records, raising it with a supervisor could become appropriate. The scenario gives no such facts.
  • Nothing changes the honesty requirement itself.

The exam-speed version

You have a little under two minutes per question in the exam. With practice, the same reasoning takes about thirty seconds:

  1. Ranking, 1 is best.
  2. My signature is my statement. No patient is at risk, so this is about honesty.
  3. Task: refuse, and help legitimately.
  4. A and B refuse; A also helps, so A first. C dodges and D falsifies; falsifying is worse, so D last.

Take this into your next question

Lesson: when an option combines a legitimate action with a false detail (“do it now, but date it yesterday”), the false detail decides its rank.

When it applies: any request to sign, record, certify or explain something on someone’s behalf. See requests to hide or misrepresent.

Finished this example?

Keep track of the examples you’ve worked through on this device.